5 Secrets from Grant Review Panels: What Reviewers Really Notice
Oct 07, 2025
Ever wondered what happens after you hit “submit”? Behind closed doors, panels of reviewers assess your proposal—and their perspectives often determine success or failure. While every scheme has different scoring rubrics, reviewers across ARC, NHMRC, and AEA consistently highlight similar themes.
Here are 5 insider “secrets” from review panels that can help you strengthen your next application.
1. Clarity trumps complexity
Reviewers often assess dozens of applications in tight timeframes. If your proposal is dense or jargon-heavy, it’s far more likely to be skimmed. Clear writing consistently scores higher, even for complex projects.
đź’ˇ Fact: In ARC Discovery rounds, reviewers typically spend under 15 minutes on a first read. If they don’t grasp your project quickly, it slips down the rankings.
2. Impact is as important as science
Strong science is essential, but reviewers want to know: why does this matter for Australia?
- ARC: contribution to national capability.
- NHMRC: improved health outcomes.
- AEA: pathways to translation and industry impact.
📌 Frame your outcomes in terms of measurable benefits, not just academic novelty.
3. ROI is always in mind
Panels are conscious that grants represent public investment. They ask: does this deliver value for money?
Proposals that clearly articulate return on investment (ROI)—whether in cost savings, jobs, exports, or system efficiencies—are seen as lower risk and higher value.
4. Partnerships strengthen credibility
Reviewers look for signs that your project has external buy-in. Partner letters of support, co-funding, or demonstrated end-user engagement show your proposal isn’t operating in isolation.
đź’ˇ Fact: In 2024, CRC-P proposals with multiple industry partners had significantly higher success rates than those with a single collaborator.
5. Presentation signals professionalism
Well-structured, error-free proposals send an unspoken signal: this team is organised and capable. Sloppy formatting or inconsistencies create doubt, even if the science is solid.
Tip: Have a colleague review formatting, references, and structure. Reviewers notice.
Grant review panels don’t just score science—they assess clarity, impact, ROI, partnerships, and professionalism. Understanding these five “secrets” can give your proposal the edge.
Straight Up has reviewed hundreds of applications—we know what panels notice. Book a discovery call to get your proposal panel-ready.