Straight Up Blog

Smart thinking, straight talking. 

Practical advice, fresh insights, and clever communication tips to help your research, proposals and strategy hit the mark.

5 Secrets from Grant Review Panels: What Reviewers Really Notice

Oct 07, 2025
5 Secrets from Grant Review Panels: What Reviewers Really Notice

Ever wondered what happens after you hit “submit”? Behind closed doors, panels of reviewers assess your proposal—and their perspectives often determine success or failure. While every scheme has different scoring rubrics, reviewers across ARC, NHMRC, and AEA consistently highlight similar themes.

Here are 5 insider “secrets” from review panels that can help you strengthen your next application.

 

1. Clarity trumps complexity

Reviewers often assess dozens of applications in tight timeframes. If your proposal is dense or jargon-heavy, it’s far more likely to be skimmed. Clear writing consistently scores higher, even for complex projects.

đź’ˇ Fact: In ARC Discovery rounds, reviewers typically spend under 15 minutes on a first read. If they don’t grasp your project quickly, it slips down the rankings.

 

2. Impact is as important as science

Strong science is essential, but reviewers want to know: why does this matter for Australia?

  • ARC: contribution to national capability.

  • NHMRC: improved health outcomes.

  • AEA: pathways to translation and industry impact.

📌 Frame your outcomes in terms of measurable benefits, not just academic novelty.

 

3. ROI is always in mind

Panels are conscious that grants represent public investment. They ask: does this deliver value for money?

Proposals that clearly articulate return on investment (ROI)—whether in cost savings, jobs, exports, or system efficiencies—are seen as lower risk and higher value.

 

4. Partnerships strengthen credibility

Reviewers look for signs that your project has external buy-in. Partner letters of support, co-funding, or demonstrated end-user engagement show your proposal isn’t operating in isolation.

đź’ˇ Fact: In 2024, CRC-P proposals with multiple industry partners had significantly higher success rates than those with a single collaborator.

 

5. Presentation signals professionalism

Well-structured, error-free proposals send an unspoken signal: this team is organised and capable. Sloppy formatting or inconsistencies create doubt, even if the science is solid.

Tip: Have a colleague review formatting, references, and structure. Reviewers notice.

 


Grant review panels don’t just score science—they assess clarity, impact, ROI, partnerships, and professionalism. Understanding these five “secrets” can give your proposal the edge.

Straight Up has reviewed hundreds of applications—we know what panels notice. Book a discovery call to get your proposal panel-ready.

 

Let's start the conversation

STAY IN THE LOOP

Join The Straight Up Newsletter

Get smart insights, funding opportunities and science communication tips—delivered straight to your inbox.

You're safe with us. We'll never spam you or sell your contact info.